Full Transcript Introduction to informed consent 0:00 This is the most important legal information you need to know in order to get through your health care journeys without being taken advantage of. 0:09 What is informed consent? 0:11 There is a legal definition. 0:12 There are four tenants to it. 0:14 This was written by Dr. 0:15 James Lyons Wheeler. 0:16 He and I have talked a few times. 0:17 he's one of the smartest people I've ever met. 0:20 We had lunch. 0:21 I talked to him about B1. 0:22 So I'm giving him some very valuable information and he has given us this incredibly valuable. 0:28 word-for-word because I don't want to mess it up. 0:31 That's how important this is. 0:32 There are four things required by the U.S. 0:34 Code of Federal Regulations for informed consent. 0:37 Written by James Layans Wheeler, Ph.D., February 10, 2026, modern medicine driven by financial incentives and institutional pressure has quietly abandoned 0:47 informed-consent and ethical restraint, transforming care into compliance enforcement while convincing itself it is acting in patients' best interests. 0:56 That's why one of the first papers I wrote was for the interagency harmonization on informed consent across all HHS agencies, 1:04 so the Department of Health and Human Services has 27 agencies. 1:07 Until those regulating informed consents do it right, nothing will change in medicine and public health. 1:12 While HHS has many important competing agendas, this one ranks very high. 1:18 Proper and legally obtained informed consent per US CFR, which is US Code of Federal Regulations, requires all four of the following to be in place. 1:27 Number one, statements of benefits and risks of any medical procedure, drug, or device. 1:33 Two, an attempt by the physician to determine if the patient understands the benefits or risks.
Legal definition and four requirements 1:40 Number three, an explanation of medically reasonable alternatives. 1:44 Number four, and absence of any threat of negative consequences to the continuance of care to patient if they decline to provide consent, 1:53 permission, parent, or assent, minors. 1:58 Ascent means agreement. 2:01 Not an electronic tablet shoved in your face with, quote, sign here, unquote. 2:06 These facts are supported by binding US federal law and long-standing bioethics doctrine, not opinion. 2:13 Here is the evidentiary foundation, point by point, grounded in US code of federal regulations and controlling legal standards. 2:22 Informed consent is a protected human right in U.S. 2:24 law. 2:25 Now remember, people refused the COVID shot and they got fired from their job. 2:29 New York City teachers, military people, and the sued afterwards and won minimum $1 million. 2:36 Some people $5 million dollars. 2:39 So you can't break informed consent. 2:42 Informed consent is not a courtesy workflow step or administrative checkbox. 2:47 It is a legal and ethical prerequisite to medical intervention, grounded in constitutional bodily autonomy and codified in federal regulation. 2:57 Two regulatory frameworks govern informed consent in the United States. 3:02 Number one, 45 CFR 46, common rule HHS regulated research, public health programs and federally funded activities. 3:11 and the second one is 21 CFR 50, FDA regulated drugs, biologics, and devices. 3:16 Both impose substantive requirements that cannot be satisfied by electronic signature alone. 3:23 Number one, disclosure of risks and benefits is mandatory. 3:28 Federal law requires explicit disclosure, of both risks, an expected benefits in language understandable to the subject. 3:35 45 CFR requires, quote, a description of any reasonably foreseeable risks or discomforts to the subject. 3:45 Also requires quote a, description any benefits to this subject or to others that may reasonably be expected. 3:51 Unquote. 3:52 Similarly, 21 CF-R mandates the same disclosures for FDA regulated products. 3:59 Failure to disclose known risks, minimization of risks or overstatement of benefits invalidates consent as a matter of law. 4:07 It has to be informed consent, so if they give you bad information, then you're not being informed. 4:13 Courts have repeatedly held that omission or distortion of material risk constitutes battery, not merely negligence. 4:21 The definition of battery in law is intentional unlawful touching or application of force to another person without their consent resulting in harmful 4:30 or offensive contact. 4:32 This contact can include hitting, pushing, spitting, or even touching someone's clothing as long as it is intentional and offensive to a reasonable person. 4:40 Battery differs from assault, which involves the threat or apprehension of imminent harm without actual contact.
Risk disclosure and patient understanding 4:48 battery completes the act. 4:50 It is the actual physical contact In criminal law, it is a misdemeanor, but it can be elevated to a felony if serious injury or deadly weapon or specific 4:59 aggravated factors are involved. 5:01 Number two, the physician must assess patient understanding. 5:04 Consent is not valid unless the clinician makes a good faith effort to determine comprehension. 5:10 45 CFR requires information be presented, quote, in language understandable to the subject, unquote. 5:18 This requirement is now satisfied by presentation alone. 5:21 Federal guidance clarifies that investigators and clinicians must ensure actual understanding, not passive receipt. 5:29 The Belmont Report from 1979, which underlies the common rule, states explicitly, quote, an agreement to participate in research is valid only if voluntarily 5:40 given by a subject who is adequately informed and has comprehended the information, unquote. 5:46 Courts have reinforced this standard in Canterbury versus Spence, 1972, the court held that informed consent requires information conveyed, 5:55 quote, in terms the patient can understand, unquote, not merely disclosed. 6:00 A tablet signature with no interaction, no questioning, and no comprehension check fails this standard. 6:06 Number three, medically reasonable alternatives must be explained. 6:10 This is not negotiable. 6:12 Federal regulations require disclosure of reasonable alternative, including the option of no intervention. 6:17 45 CFR requires, quote, a disclosure of appropriate alternative procedures or courses of treatment, if any, that might be advantageous to the subject. 6:28 21 CFL contains the identical requirement. 6:32 Courts consistently rule that failure to disclose alternatives, especially when risks differ materially, vitiates consent. 6:41 Vitiate means spoils or lessens. 6:44 Importantly, alternatives include delayed treatment, conservative management, non-pharmacologic options, declining the intervention entirely. 6:54 If alternatives are omitted, consent is legally defective even if risks are disclosed. 6:59 Number four, absence of coercion or penalty is a core requirement of informed consent. 7:06 Federal law explicitly forbids coercions, undue influence, or a penalty for refusal. 7:11 45 CFR common rule requires that informed consents be sought, quote, under circumstances that provide the prospective subject sufficient opportunity to 7:21 consider whether or not to participate, and that minimize the possibility of corrosion or undued influence.
Alternatives, coercion, and refusal rights 7:27 Unquote. 7:28 This is not limited to overt force. 7:30 Federal guidance defines coercion broadly to include implicit threats, power imbalance, and loss of access to benefits or services. 7:39 So there are pediatricians that will refuse to see a patient if the mom decides not to vaccinate. 7:45 That is against federal law. 7:48 Crucially, 45 requires disclosure of, quote, a statement that participation is voluntary. 7:54 Refusal to participate will involve no penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled, unquote. 8:01 So the physician must state that. 8:03 You can decide not to take our care or our therapy. 8:07 I won't fire you as a patient. 8:09 This clause is dispositive. 8:10 That means it settles disputes or property. 8:12 If refusal to participate in the medical therapy leads to dismissal from a practice, denial of unrelated care, delayed treatment, 8:21 labeling as noncompliant, threats of school exclusion, employment consequences, or medical abandonment, then consent is legally void. 8:30 So they can't kick out of the school if you're not vaccinated. 8:33 They can't kick you out of work if you don't do some medical treatment and your medical doctor can abandon you just because you disagree with the therapy 8:41 that they're recommending FDA regulations mirror this requirement verbatim 21 CFR states quote no informed consent may include any exculpatory language 8:52 through which the subject is made to waive or appear to wave any of the subjects legal rights." Unquote. 8:59 So there's no giving up your rights. 9:00 The hospital can't write up some paragraphs and you sign a document saying, I give up my rights, they can do that. 9:07 And 21 CFR requires, quote, a statement that participation is voluntary, that refusal to participate will involve no penalty or loss of benefits to which 9:16 the subject is otherwise entitled." So during COVID, it totally felt like medicine became the police state. 9:22 And if you didn't obey what their demands were, you get fired, You couldn't leave your house. 9:26 You can go to work, et cetera, etc. 9:28 That is a total police date that is unconstitutional. 9:31 It is completely federally unlawful. 9:36 There is no governor, there's no politician that had any right to make you stay at home, to lose your job, lose medical care, 9:45 or not go to the hospital. 9:49 Loss of access to care is a loss of benefit, threatening dismissal from care for refusal constitutes undue influence under FDA rules. 9:57 OHRP, which is the Office for Human Research Protections under the Department of Health and Human Services has this guidance, 10:06 refusal cannot affect access to care. 10:09 So the HHS Office for Human Research Protections has repeatedly clarified subjects should not be pressured to participate and should be threatened with 10:19 loss of benefits or services to which they are otherwise entitled. 10:23 This includes medical care, especially when the physician controls access. 10:27 A physician who conditions ongoing care on acceptance of a procedure invalidates consent by definition. 10:35 So if they require you take their procedure or do their therapy, and they say, if you do this, I'll keep seeing you, then that is not informed consent. 10:44 Minors. 10:45 Coercion is even more tightly prohibited. 10:48 This is very interesting. 10:49 For children, federal regulations are stricter, not looser. 10:53 45 CFR requires parental permission and child assent, where appropriate. 11:00 Assent means agreement. 11:01 45 CFR makes clear that dissent by a child must be respected unless a narrowly defined life-saving exception applies.
Electronic consent, legal consequences, and closing advice 11:11 Threatening a children with school exclusion when no mandate exists, loss of care, authority-based pressure constitutes coercion of a vulnerable population, 11:23 which is an ethical red line. 11:25 Courts treat coerced consent as no consent at all. 11:29 U.S. 11:30 courts consistently hold that consent obtained under threat or pressure is invalid. 11:35 In Canterbury v. 11:36 Spence, 1972, the court emphasized that informed consent requires free choice, not acquiescence to authority. 11:44 More broadly, consent obtain under duress converts a medical intervention into battery, regardless of intent. 11:53 This is why modern lawsuits correctly frame these cases as battery, false imprisonment, fraud, not malpractice. 12:02 Why, quote, sign here or find another doctor, unquote, fails legally. 12:06 Dismissal threats exploit a power imbalance. 12:09 Physician controls access. 12:11 Patient is dependent. 12:13 Refusal carries consequences. 12:16 that is undue influence even if spoken politely. 12:18 A consent process that includes any threat, explicit or implied, of negative consequences to continued care is not informed consent under U.S. 12:29 law. 12:30 Electronic consent does not replace substantive consent. 12:34 HHS guidance is explicit that electronic or written consent doesn't substitute for the informed-consent process itself. 12:43 HHS OHRP guidance from 2016 states, informed consent is a process, not a form. 12:51 The clinician remains responsible for explanation, assessment of understanding, opportunity for questions, absence of coercion or undue influence. 13:01 A tablet signed here workflow satisfies documentation, no consent. 13:08 legal consequence of failure, battery not paperwork error. 13:13 When informed consent requirements are not met, courts treat the intervention as unauthorized touching. 13:18 This is why modern lawsuits correctly are pivoting away from injury causation and toward battery, fraud, false imprisonment, 13:26 deprivation of civil rights. 13:28 These claims do not require proof of injury, only proof that consent was invalid. 13:33 Bottom line, legally and ethically, informed consent is a human right embedded in U.S. 13:38 federal law. 13:39 It requires disclosure, comprehension, and alternatives. 13:42 Anything less is coercion dressed up as care. 13:45 Until HHS agencies harmonize enforcement of 45 CFR 46 and 21 CF R 50, as written, rather than as administratively convenient, 13:57 Medicine will continue to drift toward institutional authority over patient autonomy. 14:02 And no amount of cause for convenience for healthcare workers, providers, medical professionals, technology, or public messaging can override that reality. 14:10 How you can help right now share this with a loved one. 14:14 So this is on Substack. 14:17 The name of this sub stack is called Popular Rationalism by Dr. 14:21 James Lyons Wheeler. 14:22 So we never get to the point where you sign an informed consent form. 14:25 Make sure you read it and understand it. 14:27 Ask the administrative staff or the doctor, what am I signing? 14:31 What does this say? 14:31 I have a question on this line. 14:34 Don't be rushed through this. 14:36 I know as Americans, we're so trained to just sign documents, like when you buy a large purchase like a house, you can sign document for 45 minutes. 14:43 And we are trained just to go on and on like that. 14:47 But when it comes to your physical body, what else is more important than your health? 14:50 Know exactly what you're signing. 14:52 If they threaten you, oh if you don't sign that, then you won't get your care that you need, or we aren't going to see you anymore, 14:56 that's battery. 14:57 That's not legal at all. 15:02 Informed consent is how you keep the autonomy of your body in control. 15:07 It's your own body. 15:08 Nobody else has any right over it or to force any kind of therapy on you. 15:12 If you can't control your whole body, what else is there? 15:14 R.F.K. 15:15 Jr. 15:15 says, a sick person has one dream. 15:17 A well person, has a thousand. 15:19 And the more medications you're on, the sicker you get. 15:25 That means you're going to die sooner and you are sicker because of the medications. 15:30 All medications are poison. 15:32 They're designed to block receptor sites and destroy enzymes and they do things that stop. 15:37 they don't do anything to enhance or to nourish or build or make healthier or stronger. 15:44 The more you take, the sickier you get. 15:45 That's the bottom line. 15:47 Take your power back. 15:48 I hope this helps.
Comments